KingMidget's Ramblings

Pull up a chair. Let's talk.

Harper Lee and Go Set A Watchman

From the moment I heard about Harper Lee’s “new novel,” I wanted nothing to do with it.  Besides the fact that To Kill A Mockingbird is an American classic and continues to intrigue new readers more than fifty years later, I have always been intrigued by the idea that Ms. Lee wrote it, saw what fame meant, and decided she wanted nothing to do with it.  I have always thought that a significant part of the greatness of the story is that she never published again.  I can respect that.  Far too many creative people don’t know when to stop.  Ms. Lee decided that her beginning would be her end.  On some level, given the acclaim her first novel got, how could she have possibly topped it.

I still want nothing to do with the book.  I think there are far too many questions about the “discovery” of the manuscript and the intentions of those who have pushed to publish it.  And I believe Ms. Lee is in no state to actually be controlling any of this.  The day before Go Set A Watchman was published, I read a piece in Bloomberg Business.  As related in the article, somebody who had known Ms. Lee for years was concerned about whether publishing the book was something she really wanted to do.  So this individual visited her in the nursing home where she now resides and asked her.  Ms. Lee’s response was something along the lines of “Why would I write a book if I didn’t want to publish it.”

And, right there, I knew this isn’t really about her.  For more than fifty years, she avoided publicity, avoided the idea of publishing again, avoided it all.  And now we are to believe at the ripe age of 89, after having a stroke and suffering from numerous physical and mental infirmities, Ms. Lee is in control of this situation and wants to publish what she insisted didn’t even exist for all those years?  I don’t think so.  She is being taken advantage of.  Here’s the Bloomberg piece.  Read it and tell me you don’t have questions.

I just read this piece from the New York Times.  Joe Nocera does a good job of connecting the dots that explain why there are so many questions about what is going on.  But he misses out on one key dot.  At the time of the book’s publication, Tonya Carter, the attorney who is doing this, wrote an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal explaining her version of how the manuscript was discovered.  Sadly, that piece is behind WSJ’s pay wall, so I can’t link directly to it.  Here’s a summary.

What I recall from reading Ms. Carter’s WSJ piece was how it didn’t add up.  Ms. Lee has a safe deposit box.  Her literary agent (who, by the way, has a literary agent 50 years after publishing their one and only book?), Ms. Carter, and a Sotheby’s representative met to examine the contents of the safe deposit box.  There were a number of things in there.  Including the manuscript for Go Set A Watchman, and the original manuscript of To Kill A Mockingbird (packed away in an envelope, apparently undisturbed all those years).  According to Ms. Carter, these materials were reviewed and then placed back in the safe deposit box and then nothing happened for the next three years.  Ms. Carter claims to have left the meeting early and she had no idea of any of the stuff that was in the safe deposit box until she went herself to look at the box in 2014.  When she “discovered” the new book.  That’s now been published.

Here’s where this all gets disconnected to me.  She claims after discovering the manuscript for Go Set A Watchman, she put everything back in the safe deposit box without bothering to see what else was in it.  Until just recently and, surprise, surprise, at the end of her WSJ piece she claims that there just may be a third book.  And a fourth book.  All lurking in that safe deposit box that nobody apparently looked at for fifty years and when they finally did in 2011, they didn’t bother looking at everything in it, and then again in 2014, Ms. Carter didn’t either.

Manuscripts aint small things.  The idea that these individuals suddenly discovered all of this stuff bends the limits of credibility.  I think Ms. Carter has known about them for a long time and has just been waiting for the right moment.  I see no need to buy Go Set A Watchman or any other “Harper Lee” novel to benefit Ms. Carter.  It pains me a little bit to reach this decision.  I am intrigued by the descriptions of Atticus as portrayed in the new book.  But I won’t go there.  Harper Lee’s wishes, expressed for more than fifty years of her life should have been respected, instead of turned on their head to benefit the interests of a big-name publisher, the agents, and attorneys who will get the windfall.

15 responses to “Harper Lee and Go Set A Watchman

  1. Carrie Rubin July 25, 2015 at 8:11 pm

    I, too, have a hard time believing she wanted this published. It just doesn’t add up with her past history. My book club is reading it for our September meeting, so I will too. I want to join them in the discussion. But I’ve put it on hold in the library. Makes me feel better than buying a copy.

  2. sknicholls July 25, 2015 at 8:24 pm

    So much in these links. I hadn’t investigated until you mentioned it in a comment the other day. I could see an old lady in a nursing home saying, “Why would I write a book if I didn’t want to publish it?”, in a flaky, little old lady way. Meaning, she may not even be aware that she published any book.

    It demonstrates the extent of her memory loss…unless someone is ghost writing for her. “A third, maybe a fourth???” That she never wanted published. I’ve written things I’m undecided about publishing. It would be terrible if I lost my senses and so-called representatives published without my sane self’s consent.

    That concerns me. I haven’t bought it or read it yet. I was planning to. Perhaps I should reconsider. I don’t want to see Atticus portrayed as a racist. That would ruin my feelings for TKAM.

    • kingmidget July 26, 2015 at 7:31 am

      I don’t want to dissuade people from reading it. I’m still intrigued by it. I just think people should realize that they may not be reading something the author ever wanted published and are instead reading something the machine got a hold of.

      • sknicholls July 26, 2015 at 7:37 am

        I read some of the one star reviews last night and comments to those reviews. I just don’t think I want to go their. What would be the point, unless I was studying her literary growth. Hopefully all writers have that. I’ve had thoughts about taking RC&R down, particularly with my focus being on learning crime fiction writing and I have a really good editor and coach. Not sure if I want it out there. Still undecided.

      • kingmidget July 26, 2015 at 12:06 pm

        I’ve learned that one star reviews are frequently the most informative.

  3. Ike Jakson July 25, 2015 at 10:34 pm

    Hi Kingmidget

    Have you read Intruder in the Dust by William Faulkner?

    I obtained my own copy of Mocking Bird after the Gregory Peck movie on it and only much later got Intruder when I started to collect Faulkner’s works and noticed the “resemblance of the theme” between Mocking Bird and Intruder in the Dust.

    There has always been some mystery. I was guided to Faulkner about thirty years ago by a University Professor at a small College in Sowega as they call South West Georgia. “Intruder” was as great a book as Mocking Bird and this professor had volumes of his own on the controversy. When I asked him what his own personal opinions were he smiled and said: “I am afraid I will have to owe you an answer on that.”

    Both were good books; there can be no doubt about it but it is a strange confusing controversy that will probably continue to linger.

    Fine Post you have here. I liked it and ticked the box.


    • kingmidget July 26, 2015 at 10:35 am

      I have not heard about the comparisons between Mockingbird and Faulkner’s story. Maybe I should find a copy of Intruder and see. Well, you have me intrigued enough that I just ordered a copy from Amazon.

  4. Kevin Brennan July 26, 2015 at 6:47 am

    Great minds think alike, man! I’m doing a post on this tomorrow. The whole thing smells like a cash grab to me, and knowing HarperCollins (my own ex-publisher!), I’m sure everyone involved had dollar signs in their eyes.

    • kingmidget July 26, 2015 at 7:32 am

      I have little doubt that is exactly the thing. As I said, the way Tonya Carter ended her WSJ article with a hint at a mysterious third and fourth book to come tells me everything I need to know. They have completely thrown over the side of the boat Harper Lee’s wishes in search of the almighty dollar.

    • kingmidget July 26, 2015 at 7:33 am

      By the way, the guy who was her literary agent back in 2011, a guy with the last name of Pinkus, is no longer her literary agent. I wonder if it’s because he didn’t support their plan.

  5. Sally July 26, 2015 at 8:42 am

    I’m with you on this. I’ve taught “To Kill a Mockingbird” for years and it is a novel that lies deep in my bones (even as a Canadian). But I’m not going out to buy the new novel. The information you share here, just confirms for me a decision I’d already made.

  6. JunkChuck July 26, 2015 at 11:53 am

    That’s one hell of a magic safety deposit box, is what I’m thinking. Wanna bet Ms. Carter yanks a rabbit out of there before all is said and done? I didn’t buy it–or think about reading it–either. Maybe someday, on the downlow, I’ll bring it home from the library.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: